Showing posts with label Business and Finance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Business and Finance. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Save Cash, Buy a Clunker

Just when you thought that America’s supply of cheap cars fell victim to Cash for Clunkers, a new website specializing in heaps costing less than $1,000 showcases prime examples of automotive detritus — some of which are still capable of highway travel.

Cars for a Grand is the brainchild of online entrepreneurs Chris Hedgecock and Jorge Gonzalez, the same guys behind Zero Paid. The site allows for individual users to post cars for sale, and scours eBay and classified ads for the best buckets of bolts. To promote the site, the founders bought a 1974 Pontiac LeMans for $900 and drove it across the country last summer.

Gonzalez says the site is popular with people who just don’t have a lot to spend, or who don’t want to spend what they do have on a car. “With gas prices and the economy the way it is, people are looking for creative ways to trim the fat,” he said.

A quick look at the site proves that cost-conscious doesn’t have to mean boring.

A bitchin’ Camaro on sale for less than the down payment on a new one proves that money can’t buy class, and short money buys even less of it. If you want to let the world know you drive a BMW, you can snag a high mileage ‘91 5-series for less than a year’s worth of internet dating fees. And, for the mechanically inclined, there are plenty of steaming heaps of coolant leaks, melted wiring harnesses and salvage titles.

Even woefully underpaid automotive bloggers can afford a $1,000 mid-’80s Nissan 300ZX in less-than-stellar condition — which we’re seriously considering. After all, a bonus of not paying $10k for a cherry example of a classic car is that you can drive it like you’re a teenager.

We’ve owned plenty of beaters throughout the years and they’ve all served us well. In fact, a ‘91 Volvo 240 with missing body trim and intermittent brake lights is currently rusting away in this writer’s driveway. Grand total? $600. It actually cost more to register and insure it for a year. It ain’t pretty, but it’s a perfect around-town car for a girlfriend who prefers public transportation.

Let us know about your favorite sub-$1,000 car. Maybe it’s the vintage VW that got you through grad school, or the clapped-out Taurus that’s still in your garage sitting next to the $4,000 LeMond you ride to work every day.

Photo: Flickr / Erica Marshall

Chinese online revenue up 30% in 2009

Online revenue generated in China surged by more than 30% to 74.3bn yuan ($10.9bn, £6.7bn) in 2009, a research firm has said.


iResearch predicts that online earnings in China from advertising, games, shopping and other activities will surge 51% to 112.3bn yuan this year.

Separately, a report said that Google has begun talking to China about not filtering content on its search engine.

It refused to confirm this, saying it "won't be giving a running commentary".

"We've said already that we will be taking a new approach in China," a Google spokesman in London said.

"We will be discussing with the Chinese authorities the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all."

Chinese dilemma

On 12 January, the company said in its blog that Chinese human rights campaigners using its Gmail service had been hacked.

It said it would hold talks with the Chinese government to stop censoring its search engine, and would leave the country if an agreement could not be reached.

China has said that foreign internet firms are welcome to do business there "according to the law".

Google currently holds about one-third of the Chinese search market, far behind Chinese rival Baidu, which has more than 60%.

China has more internet users - about 380 million - than any other country and is a lucrative market.

When Google launched google.cn in 2006, it agreed to censor some search results - such as the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, Tibetan independence or Falun Gong - as required by the Chinese government.

The Chinese business magazine Caijing reported that Google has already moved some of its Beijing-based employees to Hong Kong.

US Consumer prices fall for the first time in 50 Years

Consumer prices fall in 2009

The annual decrease is the first in more than 50 years. Month to month, a slow rise in the inflation indicator increases the likelihood that the Fed will keep interest rates low.

growing worries about a future surge in inflation, consumer prices barely budged last month and fell for all of 2009 -- the first annual decline in more than half a century.

The latest report on the consumer price index, released Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, increases the likelihood that Federal Reserve officials at their next meeting later this month will stand pat on their policy of setting interest rates at near zero for "an extended period."


In recent weeks, there have been increasing signs of a split at the Fed over how soon the central bank should begin tightening credit and monetary policy to avoid a future outbreak of inflation. Some officials want to start raising rates relatively soon, while most see no hurry to change course amid double-digit unemployment and little growth in prices.

And there appears to be little or no support for a pull-back in the immediate future.

"The Fed is correct in its analysis of inflation, and should be more worried about unemployment than inflation at this stage of the game," Diane Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial, wrote in a research note.

In December, consumer prices edged up just 0.1% from November, and they were up 2.7% from a year earlier. Stripping out food and energy prices, which tend to be volatile, consumer prices were up a modest 1.7% over the 12-month period.

Averaging all the months last year, the government said, the price index fell 0.4% from 2008. The last time this measure dropped was in 1955 when Dwight D. Eisenhower was president and Ray Kroc opened his first McDonald's restaurant.

Back then, unemployment was below 5% and the economy was creating hundreds of thousands of jobs a month.

Last year was a different story. The fall in the consumer price index largely stemmed from lower oil prices and underscored the deep recession that also held down wages and led to outright price declines for certain goods, such as personal computers and used cars, as well as for services such as lodging.

"It's good news for consumers; inflation was low," said Nigel Gault, an economist at IHS Global Insight. But the bad news, he said, was that fewer people in America had jobs, and wages overall barely kept pace.

Gault reckons this year won't be any better for consumers. He sees overall prices rising 1.7% this year, and core inflation, which excludes food and energy, turning up just 1.5%. But wages will probably increase at a similarly modest rate, meaning most consumers won't see gains in their buying power.

Bank of America sees $194m loss

Wall Street giant Bank of America has reported a net loss of $194m (£120m) in the last three months of 2009.

That compared with a loss of $1.8bn in the same period a year earlier.

It added that it had repaid the $45bn government bail-out money it had received, but taking the impact of this into account, it made a loss of $5.2bn.

Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley said it made a profit of $413m in the fourth quarter, helped by a return to profit in its investment banking business.

A year ago, the bank reported a $10.5bn loss, the bulk of which came from investment banking, which made massive losses at the height of the financial crisis.

Morgan Stanley also said it had set aside $14.4bn in compensation expenses for 2009 - a 31% increase on the previous year.

Earlier this week, fellow US bank JP Morgan Chase reported a profit of $3.3bn, while Citigroup said it made a $7.6bn loss in the final quarter.

'Disappointing' loss

For the whole of 2009, Bank of America made a net profit of $6.3bn, an increase on the $4bn profit it made in 2008.

The bank also said it had set aside $10.1bn to cover bad loans during the quarter.

"While it's disappointing to report a loss for the fourth quarter, there were a number of important accomplishments worth noting," said chief executive Brian Moynihan.

"First, we repaid the American taxpayer, with interest, for the Tarp [Troubled Asset Relief Program] investment.

"Second, we have taken steps to strengthen our balance sheet through successful securities offerings. And third, all of our non-credit businesses recorded positive contributions to our results."

'Strange creature'

Bank of America said paying back the Tarp money cost it $4bn.

It received the money after agreeing to buy Merrill Lynch in September 2008 in a deal worth $50bn.

The chief executive at the time, Ken Lewis, was widely criticised for going ahead with the purchase of Merrill, and he left the bank at the end of 2009.

The bank was now a "strange creature", said Stephen Pope, chief global equity strategist at Cantor Fitzgerald.

"You have got Merrill Lynch on the investment banking side... [providing] probably healthy revenues from bond underwriting and trading.

"However, Bank of America is probably still facing difficulties of impairment charges against outstanding commercial and consumer debt."

Bank of America's credit cards division made a quarterly loss of $1bn, while its mortgage business lost $993m.

Cadbury's board agrees £12bn sale to Kraft

Cadbury, makers of Creme Eggs

Today's bid is an increase on Kraft's previous offer of around 770p, which Cadbury's chairman had described as 'derisory'. Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

Cadbury will accept defeat in its battle to stay independent today by recommending a £12bn takeover from US rival Kraft that threatens to reignite a fierce debate about the vulnerability of British industry.

The 186-year-old chocolate maker decided to throw in the towel late last night after a large foreign shareholder joined hedge funds in indicating it would accept an improved offer from Kraft, and the prospect of a rival bid from Hershey faded. Cadbury's board, led by chairman Roger Carr, will announce its decision to recommend the revised 850p-a-share bid to all shareholders through a ­statement to the stock exchange this morning, according to sources close to the company.

Although a board recommendation is not binding, it is highly unusual for a ­company to resist a hostile takeover once its management has capitulated.

The confectionery giant joins a list of British industrial names to have fallen to foreign takeovers in similar circumstances in recent years. More than 50 ­leading companies have gone, including BAA, Boots, Cazenove, Corus, ICI, Jaguar Land Rover, P&O, Pilkington and Scottish Power.

Until now Cadbury had fought a public campaign to preserve its independence, attracting support from Lord Mandelson, the business secretary, who warned Kraft to expect "huge opposition" from the ­government if it wanted to make a "fast buck" by buying Cadbury.

His intervention is ­understood to have rattled Kraft's chief executive, Irene Rosenfeld, who recently met shareholders in London, but the US company chose to negotiate a raised offer after calculating that the political risk was manageable.

Cadbury unions have warned that up to 30,000 jobs would be put at risk by the deal as Kraft would be weighed down by some £22bn in debt. Kraft has a record of aggressive cost-cutting, and the union Unite said that between 2004 and 2008 it shed 19,000 jobs and closed 35 sites to help reduce its debt.

Today's bid of 850p-a-share (including a 10p dividend) is an increase on Kraft's previous offer of around 770p in cash and shares, which Carr had previously described as "derisory". Nonetheless it is at the low end of many independent experts' predictions for an agreed price and comes after Cadbury's chief executive, Todd Spitzer, appeared to suggest he thought its shares were worth £10 each.

A source close to Cadbury said the decision had been taken with "a heavy heart" but followed advice from its investment bankers that any increase in Kraft's bid beyond 830p would succeed.

More than a quarter of Cadbury shares are now in the hands of hedge funds which bought them in the hope of a deal. The final straw came when Franklin Templeton, a large US mutual fund with a 7% stake, indicated it would accept 830p.

The circumstances of the defeat are likely to reopen a debate about the role of hedge funds and other investors during takeovers. Lord Myners, the City minister, has been vocal in his criticism of short-termism among institutional fund managers. Cadbury was the first big test of a supposed new mood after the financial crash and raised strong emotions because of its history as a progressive employer, supporter of fair trade and proponent of good corporate governance.

Nevertheless, its management's actions appear to have followed a well-worn path in such situations. Carr cut his teeth as chief executive of Williams, an industrial conglomerate also sold overseas, and worked with Sir Nigel Rudd, who recommended the sale of Boots two years ago.

Under Takeover Panel rules, Kraft had until midnight tonight to raise its offer. There is still a chance that Hershey may intervene, but sources close to Cadbury last night said that was unlikely.

The Ultimate Cell Phone Plans Comparison

On Friday, Verizon Wireless announced pricing plan restructuring that would reduce the cost of voice usage. AT&T Wireless quickly followed suit and unveiled their updated cell phone plans as well. Today is the day that those changes go into effect.

While both carriers announced these changes as efforts to simplify plans, the real truth behind the story is that the profits are in the data: Verizon’s revenue is now up 24% (they reported $15.8 billion in Q309), with 17% coming from data services.

I think that there is still a long way to go before it gets to a point where picking a cell phone plan is simple, even after these various many attempts by the carriers in 2009. There are still way too many plan combination.

This is our best attempt to simplify all of the plan combination and it was painful, but here it is, The Ultimate Cell Phone Plans Comparison:

Click Image to Enlarge


The Ultimate Cell Phone Plan Comparison

Is 2010 the year business IT grows up?

Stressed business man in office, workplace, mental health, frustration, computer, desk: Managers 'one of the biggest threats to workers? mental health'
Corporate IT departments need to start treating workers more like consumers Photo: GETTY

In the outside world we’re all known as consumers – but set foot inside corporate walls and suddenly every user becomes the IT department’s enemy. You’re not to be trusted, and you’re certainly no expert on what technologies can be used to make you more productive.

This year, however, is set to be the first when the great strides being made in the consumer web will start to gain greater adoption in corporate environments. Email, files and other resources are all likely to be stored online, in “the cloud”, for more and more businesses.

Google, of course is the prime example of this, and they’ve placed their tanks firmly on the lawn of Microsoft with their Google Apps suite of email and office products. Google’s CEO, Eric Schmidt, describes cloud computing as “the centrepiece of our 2010 strategy” – don’t expect them to take their foot off the gas, but equally, don’t expect Microsoft to take this lying down. Windows 7 is an indication that the team in Redmond are fighting back, and you’ll see some interesting developments with Microsoft’s online versions of Outlook and Office during 2010. At last, there will be meaningful competition when it comes to collaboration online.

The social network will enter corporations in 2010 in a more measured and controlled way. The launch of Chatter by Salesforce.com later this year will really force organisations to look at social networking as a productivity tool as opposed to something that causes inefficiency.

“The flow of real-time information from Facebook and Twitter have changed our lives. But our business applications have not kept up,” says Marc Benioff, chairman and chief executive of Salesforce.com.

“Businesses are asking, ‘Why is it easy to follow what Ashton Kutcher is up to on Twitter, but hard to track what my sales reps are doing?’ Yet real-time information is essential to good work. The idea behind Chatter is simple: ‘Know it now’.”

In a business context, that might mean, for instance, a news feed tailored to you, detailing whatever data is most important to your job, updated in real time. It might also include where your colleagues are. This is going to be hugely powerful when applied correctly – but only the companies with an advanced outlook on how they allow their staff to collaborate together are set to gain the most advantage from this shift.

Finally, mobile applications, which are booming in the consumer marketplace thanks primarily to Apple and the iPhone, will be used inside companies. Nic Newman, head of strategy at mobile firm Tigerspike, is one of an increasing number of experts who believe that 2010 will be the year that businesses begin to embrace mobile applications.

“Companies are now starting to unlock the huge potential that mobile can give their organisations. PriceWaterhouse Coopers has launched a mobile-based employee engagement tool around ‘what I would like to change’, and Morgan Stanley use it to send key market audio updates to all employees by 10am each morning. 2010 is the year of ‘business goes mobile’.”

One major technical advancement in this space that will gain broader adoption in 2010 is a technology known as HTML 5. This will allow developers to build applications that are more interactive and ready for use offline – imagine being able to submit or approve expenses in this way, or review accounts using a single click while on the move.

It’s reality to very few of us at the moment but the ‘Blackberry’ effect is rapidly spreading beyond email and into other applications: many now expect much more information to be accessible at any time.

So working in 2010 could feel a little bit more pleasant; but it relies on IT departments waking up to the need to embrace consumer technology and it also requires them to treat their users more like consumers. IT departments who make this shift will thrive but those who don’t may struggle to survive.

Obama proposes bank fee, slams Wall Street

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama on Thursday proposed Wall Street banks pay up to $117 billion to reimburse taxpayers for the financial bailout, as he slammed bankers for their "massive profits and obscene bonuses."

Striking a populist tone, Obama called for a fee on the biggest U.S. banks to "recover every single dime" the government spent rescuing the financial sector from its worst crisis since the Great Depression.

"My determination to achieve this goal is only heightened when I see reports of massive profits and obscene bonuses at some of the very firms who owe their continued existence to the American people," Obama told reporters at a White House event.

Obama and his Democratic allies in Congress are seizing on the chance to cast Wall Street as its political foil in a congressional election year when their party is worried Republicans might weaken its majority status.

Obama, who has labeled financial executives "fat cats" for the huge bonuses they have received, is taking an increasingly tougher line against the industry.

Democrats hope that will resonate with an American public furious at multimillion-dollar bonuses being handed out by banks as the middle-class struggles with double-digit unemployment.

The fee is also aimed at helping to reduce the ballooning U.S. budget deficit.

Democrats in Congress signaled they would quickly take up the legislation.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus praised Obama for "working to ensure taxpayers see a return on their investment."

"I remain committed to working with the president, and my colleagues across the aisle, to make sure this proposal is right," he said.

REPUBLICANS CRITICIZE FEE

But Republicans may try to block it. Some of them have criticized the bank fee as a tax that would be passed on to small businesses and Americans with savings accounts.

Republican Representative Scott Garrett said the bank tax would "further cripple the economy" through its impact on consumers and small firms.

The aim of Obama's proposal is to recoup losses from the $700 billion rescue program of U.S. banks called the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

It calls for a levy of 0.15 of a percentage point on the balance sheets of companies with assets exceeding $50 billion.

The Obama administration expects to raise $90 billion over the first 10 years, and thinks this will ultimately cover all losses from TARP, although at the moment these losses are being projected at $117 billion.

Bank analysts at Credit Suisse said the impact would be felt heavily by Wall Street powerhouses Goldman Sachs Group and Morgan Stanley.

They saw it denting Goldman's earnings per share by 10 percent in 2011 and Morgan Stanley's by 19 percent. U.S. bank shares ended Thursday higher, recovering from earlier slippage in the week when investors had anticipated the levy.

Obama has suffered a backlash for supporting the rescue program, which was begun in the Bush administration.

Forged after the collapse of U.S. investment bank Lehman Brothers and multibillion-dollar rescue of insurance giant American International Group, TARP helped stem the crisis by injecting public capital into the biggest U.S. banks and convincing investors no others would be allowed to fail.

The administration said it was needed to avert a catastrophe in the broader economy, but it did not prevent the country from sliding into a deep recession that has pushed unemployment to a 26-year high of 10 percent.

Wall Street has rebounded, raking in bumper profits. This has helped many of the banks repay their financial bailout funds, freeing them of government rules on compensation and allowing them to pay out major staff bonuses.

FEW SPARED

Big financial firms consider the fee unfair because it will apply even to those companies that have already repaid the rescue funds they received as well as to firms that got no bailout money to start with.

But the White House argues that the industry as a whole benefited from the calm the rescue package brought to the markets. Obama also said the financial industry bears responsibility for the crisis because of what he said were its reckless actions that led to the subprime mortgage meltdown.

Financial industry analysts said the fee would act as a drag on the sector, though the fact that the fee will be spread out over 10 years lessens the impact.

"It throws some sand into the gears. It's one more thing dragging on the sector, but it's spread over 10 years, so it's not so consequential. It's petty theft from bank balance sheets," said Robert Albertson, chief strategist at Sandler O'Neill in New York.

Full details of the fee proposal will not be laid out until Obama delivers his budget for fiscal 2011 in early February, and will then be subject to shaping by Congress.

AIG will be subject to the fee, but mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are under government conservatorship, will be excluded, as will still-ailing U.S. automakers that got bailout money.

The bank fee proposal come as Congress is weighing sweeping financial regulatory reforms in the face of stiff industry opposition.

Obama is pushing such an overhaul, but some liberal supporters of Obama have accused him of coddling Wall Street by not seek a more robust package of Wall Street reforms.

Wall Street chiefs were grilled on Wednesday at the opening hearing of a special inquiry into the 2008 financial crisis and the resulting taxpayer bailout to save their industry.

The heads of Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America faced the first public hearing of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. It will convene throughout the year and is expected to issue a report by December 15.

Obama said the goal of the bank fee is "not to punish Wall Street firms but rather to prevent the abuse and excess that nearly caused the collapse of many of these firms and the financial system itself."

"We cannot go back to business as usual," he said.

Can Social Media Comments Actually Affect Your Credit? Yup.

Can your comments affect your credit? Yup.

Did you know that everything you and those in your network do and discuss online may be compiled and provided to creditors? If your settings are tuned to public, it's true. This includes your Facebook status updates, Twitter "tweets," joining online clubs, linking a Web site, and even posting a comment on a news blog (such as, well, this one).

It's fascinating stuff. Here is my full story that came out today, Social networking: Your key to easy credit?, but in brief -

What's going on: In hopes of identifying good credit customers, some financial institutions are tapping into the information you and your friends reveal online. The idea is that the friends you keep and data you disclose may help them make more accurate business decisions.

Who is doing it: Companies such as Rapleaf hunt and gather social networking transmissions, turning the conversations you have in your network into consumer profiles. These profiles provide banks with insight into your behavior patterns - what you like and dislike, want and don't want, do well and do poorly.

How it's being used: There are a couple of ways this information may be applied. It can help creditors promote certain products, cutting down on marketing waste. Why sent pre-approval letters to people not interested, right?

Lowering lending risk is another reason. Creditors can see if people in your network have accounts with them, and are free to look at how they are handling those accounts. The presumption is that if those in your network are responsible cardholders, there is a better chance you will be too. So, if a bank is on the fence about whether to extend you credit, you may become eligible if those in your network are good credit customers.

Having a robust online social network can also expedite loan acceptance. If you're connected to a lot of people who are great credit risks, it can speed you through the process. Amazing, isn't it?

What you can do. While financial institutions and companies that gather your online data are emphatic that the idea is to increase the odds of a person getting credit, what you reveal online can have unintended consequences. Therefore, if you want to opt out, turn all of your settings to private. Other best practices:

- Don't accept invitations to your social networking site from people until you check their profiles out first.

- Be acutely aware of what you write. Don't make public anything you don't want public.

- Take an annual inventory of all your social networking sites and delete people and information that can potentially damage you in the eyes of a creditor or employer.

There is a problem to going completely underground, of course. If you're like me and want to be found (I couldn't conduct my business as well without being public), you won't be

The Highest Global Inflation Rates

While those of us in the U.S. may complain about the increasing cost of living, many countries in the world have a much higher rate of inflation. While the U.S., Canada, the UK and Spain have inflation rates below 3%, Zimbabwe has the most shocking inflation rate in the world at 12,563%.

Click to Enlarge

The Highest Global Inflation Rates

Bank bonus season begins

As banks get the big paychecks ready, they're also scrambling to spin the issue as best they can.


cash stack © Steve Cole/Photodisc Green/Getty Images
We're about to enter that happiest time of the year, at least if you're a banker: bonus season.

But this year, things are a little different. Oh, the sizes of the bonuses haven't dropped off. In fact, signs point to an even bigger payout explosion than before.

What's different this time is the intense scrutiny and general disapproval of the bonuses -- from mainstream America to Washington, D.C. And banks are having a heck of a time figuring out how to spin the issue to be most palatable to critics.

We can already hear the violins. Some bonuses will have more stock in them this year, and bankers are complaining that they will be left short of cash. And even worse, some of the bonus pay will be -- gasp -- deferred!

"I don't think it's just whining," one Wall Street worker told The Wall Street Journal. "There are legitimate liquidity issues that people have."

Now, you can dress a bonus up or down any way you want, but that doesn't change the fact that Goldman Sachs (GS) is expected to dole out an average of $595,000 per employee for 2009. At JPMorgan Chase (JPM), employees are expecting $463,000 on average, according to The New York Times.

The top bosses will likely get as much as seven or eight figures. The head of Citigroup's (C) investment bank, for example, will pull in $9 million in stock. Yeah, this is the same Citigroup that needed a massive government bailout and is still 34% owned by taxpayers.

Which brings us to another issue: The government bailout. As the excellent blog Baseline Scenario points out, banks will argue that they made massive profits this year fair-and-square and should be allowed to pay mega-bonuses.

But, writes Simon Johnson, this is wrong at two levels. The profits "were solely the result of massive government intervention, designed at saving and recapitalizing big banks." Also, he adds, the recapitalization effort works only if banks keep their profits -- not pay them out.

So where do we go from here? Banks, for their part, are spinning the bonus issue as best they can and praying that the criticism will die down.

Politicians, sensing the increasing outrage from the masses, are looking for ways to play this. New York's attorney general wants a detailed accounting of the bonuses banks are planning. The Obama administration is mulling a flat-out fee for banks instead of any sort of banker tax that can be easily dodged.

Johnson at Baseline Scenario supports a supertax on bankers that received the first round of TARP funds. "Essentially, we need a steeply progressive windfall income tax –- tied to the receipt of a particular form of income," he writes. This will help tilt the playing field towards smaller participants in the financial markets, he adds, which is desperately needed.

One of the founders of Citigroup told The New York Times that people won't trust banks again until they scale back bonuses for good -- but that doesn't seem likely.

"There is nothing I’ve seen that gives me the slightest feeling that these people have learned anything from the crisis," said the founder, John Reed. "They just don’t get it. They are off in a different world."


12 Free Web 2.0 Startups That Help Manage Small Businesses

Anyone who lived through the late 90's remembers the endless barrage of buzzwords about computerized productivity. "The paperless office" and "e-business" are but a few of the slogans capturing how the Internet was going to revolutionize our work. Annoying as these slogans became, the ideals behind them were unquestionably desirable. Who wouldn't want to work in a paperless office? Reality hasn't fully caught up to these ideals, but various Web 2.0 startups have come awfully close. Today we take a look at 12 services that help small businesses operate more efficiently and inexpensively. Neglect them at your peril, because your competitors surely haven't!

Expense Tracking & Money Management

Mint

Plain and simply, no modern business should be operating without Mint. Mint functions by synching with your bank accounts, extracting your financial data and sorting it into charts and graphs that let you make intelligent decisions. Any small business owner who sits at a desk covered in random bank statements, accounting pads and "back of the napkin" calculations will appreciate the simplicity and automation Mint offers. While the service is intended for individual use, small businesses can benefit from at least 90% of Mint's functionality in exactly the same way. Simply import your corporate bank accounts or credit cards and watch as Mint breaks down your finances in precise, useful detail.

InstaCalc

No small part of a business owner's day involves "running the numbers." For all the advances made in social networking, business is still fundamentally about profit and loss and the many numbers and metrics further down the chain. Failure to stay on top of these metrics day to day can spell huge losses or even bankruptcy. That said, knowing your numbers need not require lugging out your old TI-84 graphing calculator. And don't even think about using the calculator on your phone. Instead, use Instacalc, the free web 2.0 calculator that can handle everything from addition and subtraction to calculus and generate results in any number of easy-to-read charts or graphs. No matter what your key numbers are, Instacalc makes calculating them quick and painless.

Wesabe

An all-purpose money management service, Wesabe fulfills many of the same goals as Mint.com. What makes it independently useful, however, is that Wesabe is also home to a community of small business owners and entrepreneurs that discuss financial advice and strategies amongst each other. In fact, community participation lies at the core of Wesabe's entire approach to money management. One manifestation of this is how Wesabe "generates detailed merchant reviews from the community, allowing you to see what others think, making you a smarter consumer." With reviews like "if Chuck Norris were a personal finance tool, he'd be Wesabe", can any small business afford not not to give the free service a crack at managing its finances?

Collaboration

Basecamp

The number one challenge of any remote business is getting people in different places to work toward the same goals. In this regard, Basecamp is a bonafide godsend. The 37 Signals product is a full-service product management platform, permitting teams to enumerate tasks, set milestones, and leave a documented record of all progress (or lack thereof) on any given project. Gone are the days of firing off an e-mail or text message containing tasks that get lost in corporate limbo. With Basecamp, everything that is discussed and agreed upon becomes a matter of public record, allowing for maximum accountability from all team members. A 30 day free trial is available, followed by flexibly priced subscriptions virtually any business can afford.

Campfire

Another invaluable web 2.0 product from 37 Signals is Campfire, a collaborative chat platform intended for use side by side with Basecamp. Unlike instant messaging services, Campfire was built from the ground up with business chat in mind. Features include secure, password-protected chatrooms for discussions with clients or employees as well as secure one on one chats. Your sensitive data is safe on Campfire, which has gone out of its way to use encryption and other safeguards that protect private corporate information. Additionally, Campfire chats support easy dragging and dropping of graphics, diagrams, spreadsheets and other media pertinent to your discussions.

GoToMeeting

Even small businesses are increasingly finding themselves dealing with remote customers or vendors via the web. Sadly, online communication is seldom as clearly understood as face to face. Frequently, business owners in these situations find themselves saying things like "ugh! If I could just show this guy what's on my screen everything would be crystal clear!" GoToMeeting doesn't put you face to face with your clients, but it may be the next best thing. The service works by replacing awkward phone calls and web chats with interactive "webinars", where each party can not only speak verbally, but also see what's on the other party's computer screen in real time. Imagine the difference between a graphic designer visually showing a client examples of a logo or web layout, for instance, versus merely articulating it over the phone. There's no contest! GoToMeeting.com offers a free trial so you can try it out without risk.

Meebo

Of course, not every small business can do away with instant messaging completely. No matter how hip to the game your own employees are, your colleagues outside the company may still be clinging to AIM and Yahoo. But that doesn't mean you need to have four different IM programs running at once! Instead, head on over to Meebo.com. From here, you can sign in to every IM service imagineable, from AIM and Yahoo to Facebook and Google Talk simultaneously. One interface, one window. Just sign in, leave it open in a stray Firefox tab and use it when needed. No more memory-hogging IM applications on your office computers!

Invoicing & Billing

Freshbooks

It goes without saying that the point of any business is getting paid. Unfortunately, many small businesses burden themselves with cumbersome invoicing systems involving envelopes, filing cabinets and manilla folders. Who has the time to stay on top of such a manual, outdated procedure? Say goodbye to all of your invoicing hassles and use Freshbooks, the service that automates and records every invoice you send out. Ideal for freelancers and service businesses, Freshbooks can be set up to invoice on set intervals, eliminating the need to juggle different payout dates mentally. While paid subscriptions are available for larger businesses, the free option permits unlimited invoices and an unlimited number of clients to invoice.

SidejobTrack

Another excellent web 2.0 billing and invoicing service for small businesses and contractors is Sidejob Track. Offering everything from customizable invoices, the ability to invoice by project total or percentage increments and simplification of reporting your income to the IRS, Sidejob Track will whip your company's outmoded, outdated invoicing system into automated, digitized, 21st century shape. Best of all, joining is completely free!

Organization

Google Calendar

Basecamp is great for company-wide organization, but what about the personal schedule and tasks of an individual businessperson? For this, no web application is superior to Google Calendar. On a single screen, you can maintain several calendars (say, work, exercise, family) demarcated by different colored labels. Best of all, Google Calendar lets you get an update on upcoming tasks via SMS text message, no matter where you happen to be.

Neptune

Another excellent, nuts and bolts, "get things done" application for individual businesspeople is Neptune. Built on the principles of David Allen's time management classic Getting Things Done, Neptune is a simple, no-frills system that contains your desired tasks, e-mails you a reminder in the morning, and allows you to store documents pertaining to the tasks you enumerate. It works on any modern browser and has been featured time and time again in collections of the best Web 2.0 productivity apps!

Remember The Milk

A frequent complaint about online calendars and organizers is that they're great as far as they go, but if you forget to log in and use them, what good are they? Web 2.0's answer to this question is Remember the Milk, which will e-mail, text message, and instant message you reminders at pre-set intervals. If you're the kind of person who needs to be reminded over and over to get something done, Remember The Milk is one of the most worthwhile programs on this entire list. It has the potential to immediately transform how you retain and execute your day to day tasks.

6 Questions to Ask Before Starting a Business

1. D o you believe you have what it takes?

We don't mean personal characteristics -- or not just personal character

istics, anyway. Do you believe you have all the skills, energy, money, people, and knowledge to start a business? Founders who carefully identify and evaluate their resources in pursuit of a well-defined goal display "entrepreneurial self-efficacy," a trait many academics believe to be the best predictor of success.

2. Are you able to let other people down?

A founder may set out in a rowboat, but pretty soon, he is piloting a cabin cruiser with investors and employees on board and their families huddled belowdecks. Risking your own fortunes is easy compared with risking the fortunes of those who believe in you. "These people may not completely understand the business," says J. Robert Baum, an associate professor of entrepreneurship at the University of Maryland. "They may not understand the level of risk. But they think they'll be OK because you are so smart. Breaking their dreams is very painful."

3. How do you handle setbacks?

When you are smiling, the whole company smiles with you. In their book Resonant Leadership: Renewing Yourself and Connecting With Others Through Mindfulness, Hope, and Compassion, Richard Boyatzis and Annie McKee explain that emotions are contagious: Morale rises and falls with the mood of the leader. Consequently, people who succumb to black moods or depression can fatally infect their own companies.
Because some people have an inflated idea of their resilience, Mayer suggests performing a kind of reference check on yourself -- ask people who know you well how you handle adversity.

4. Are you really an inventor, rather than an entrepreneur?

Raising a child is generally more challenging than creating a child, and the same is true of new products. Some people mistake the act of invention for the tough part. "Too many times, these inventor types spend an inordinate amount of time on the patent and making the prototype just so," says Mike Drummond, editor in chief and co-owner of Inventors Digest. "They think once they've done that,

the world will beat a path to their doorstep. My take is that product development is a team sport. Inventors don't get that. Entrepreneurs do."

5. Can you acc

ept that your company may outgrow

you?

Some entrepreneurs love to brag that they don't need an exit strategy, because they are not going anywhere. But at some point, your business may need you less than you ne

ed it. That's particularly true at fast-growth companies, at which entrepreneurs may not have enough time to develop the necessary leadership and business skills. Mayer has seen founders bring in presidents or senior executives from the outside, only to sabotage them. "They do it by not giving them the necessary information," says Mayer. "They do it by not stepping back and by involving themselves with managers in a way that is inappropriate in the chain of command. They can be disruptive during meetings."

6. When you look in the mirror, does an entrepreneur look back?

If so, and if that's the reason you are starting a company, beware. Many traits -- persistence, creativity, and risk tolerance among them -- are commonly ascribed to entrepreneurs. But having those traits doesn't much improve the odds that you will succeed. "Research into entrepreneurs' personal traits says things like persistence and need for achievement explain only about 5 percent to 10 percent" of the difference between people who start companies and those who don't, according to Baum. "They are less important than external predictors like the spirit of the times, the economy, and changes within an industry.

9 Businesses You Can Start In Your Pajamas in 2010


Internet Marketing –– Jason Sadler, IWearYourShirt.com

So you've got a ton of friends on Facebook and a loyal Twitter following. Why not profit off them? Jason Sadler has found a way to capitalize on all the hype surrounding social media marketing. Three-hundred sixty-five days a year, Sadler serves as a live billboard for companies and charities on all the major social media sites. Sadler, who launched IWearYourShirt.com at the end of 2008, wears a shirt a day, and sells each calendar day according to its numerical value. On January 10, for example, a company would pay Sadler $10 to wear its shirt. He works from his home in Jacksonville, Florida, and leverages his social media following by blogging, tweeting, filming a live video show, and updating his Facebook photo, all while wearing the designated T-shirt of the day. And, yes, he will still wear your shirt to a wedding, or even if he's sick in bed. Now that the idea has taken off, Sadler has hired a West Coast counterpart -- with a whole new following -- to expand the company's marketing reach.

7 Ways to Make Money Without Actually Having a Job

Job market got you down? If applying to real-person jobs isn’t landing you the position you want, it may be time to try something different. Like offering up your body to medicine. Or selling your opinion for $50/hour. Or, easiest yet, hanging out at someone else’s house.

We’ve come up with seven ways you can make money without actually having a job. See if any of the opportunities below help you think outside the employment box.

1. House Sitting

homestay

While petsitting and babysitting generally don’t involve much down time, house sitting is a literal job: You sit in someone else’s house. For money. Sure, you have to water their plants every so often, but the rest of the time, you can relax. Just don’t break or steal anything.

Pros: Get paid to sit around in someone else’s house.
Cons: None, unless you throw a kegger while you’re there.

Pay range: $50+ per day.

2. Medical studies

syringe

Can’t sleep? Depressed or anxious? Got bunions? Chances are, someone wants to use you as a guinea pig for their latest product. Craigslist is usually chock full of opportunities in this field.

Pros: Get paid while potentially curing whatever ails you.
Cons: Nobody’s sure what the side effects are. That’s why they’re hiring you.

Pay range: $100+

3. Consumer surveys

onlinesurveys

A quick, painless way to get pennies in your cup is to fill out customer surveys for marketing research companies. Mind you, it’s going to take a lot of Internet time to turn those pennies into dollars. If time is what you have, surveys might be worth a try.

Pros: Low effort.
Cons: Low pay. Scammers abound in this industry.

Pay range: Usually a few dollars per survey.

4. Homestays

foreignstudent

Students around the world come to the US to study and learn English. Many of these students choose to live with American families to get to know the culture better. Those host families, meanwhile, get paid a stipend to accommodate that student.

Pros: Get paid to have a student live with you and talk to them in English.
Cons: You may hate the student.

Pay range: $500+/month

5. Egg/sperm donation

sperm
Image: Yale Medicine

Sperm donation doesn’t net you as much as donating eggs does. Then again, giving sperm doesn’t require hormones, weight gain, and surgical harvesting sessions.. Call it hazard pay.

Pros: It’s easy, if you’re a guy.
Cons: It’s hard and painful, if you’re a woman.

Pay range: Sperm: $100—if you’re lucky. Eggs: $1,000-$30,000+

6. Focus groups

focusgroup
Image: Behavior Research

Research departments will pay you hundreds of dollars to sit around for a few hours and discuss topics of their choosing. The pay per hour can be good, if you’re selected.

Pros: High pay for little time.
Cons: You might not get selected. Watch for scammers.

Pay range: $50+/hour

7. Surrogacy

preg

If you’ve successfully carried a child to term once before, why not do it again–for pay? Lots of couples want you to carry their precious bundle, often for close to $10,000.

Pros: Get paid to for living your life–with someone else’s bundle of joy in your stomach.
Cons: It’s someone else’s bundle of joy.

Pay range: $7,000+